Ittekimasu Simple Japanese Phrases

Meaning: Im leaving.   Pronunciation: Ittekimasu (Click audio file) Japanese Characters: 㠁„㠁 £Ã£  ¦Ã£  Ã£  ¾Ã£ â„¢Ã£â‚¬â€š Notes: Itterasshai 㠁„㠁 £Ã£  ¦Ã£â€šâ€°Ã£  £Ã£ â€"ã‚Æ'㠁„ is a response.

The History Of Sexuality, Volume 1, By Michel Foucault

In Part V of The History of Sexuality, Volume 1, Michel Foucault documents the historical shift from a sovereign power concentrated in death to a normalized, institutionalized regulation of life focused in part on the control of sexuality. He argues that this movement marks not only a reconceptualization of the living subject as a valuable source of both labor and production but also a new political interest in sex as a site of surveillance, classification, and management. Individuals in the contemporary social order define themselves and are defined through their relation to sex and sexuality, so while sex might feel â€Å"taboo† and thus appear to subvert social control, it in fact operates within a hegemonic system of meaning and thus†¦show more content†¦Sex, then, represents a significant locus of power because: â€Å"It fitted in both categories at once, giving rise to infinitesimal surveillances, permanent controls, extremely meticulous orderings of space, indeterminate medical or psychological examinations, to an entire micro-power concerned with the body. But it gave rise as well to comprehensive measures, statistical assessments, and interventions aimed at the entire social body or at groups taken as a whole. Sex was a means of access both to the life of the body and the life of the species.† (146) The movement from â€Å"a symbolic of blood to an analytics of sexuality† (148)—from a power concentrated in death to one concentrated in life—resulted in an increased concern with naming and documenting individual presentations of sexuality, in part because sex provided, and continues to provide, a way to access both the life of an individual and the life of a population. In contemporary society, power operates not only through the surveillance and categorization of sexualities, but also through a valorization of the act of sex as a key component to identity formation. Though Western culture often conceives of sex as â€Å"natural,† and thus divorced from the politics of power, Foucault argues that â€Å"sex is the most speculative, most ideal, and most internal element in a deployment of sexuality organized by power† (155). WhatShow MoreRelated Eve Kosofsky Sedgwicks Tendencies: Queerness and Oppression1208 Words   |  5 PagesTendencies: Queer ness and Oppression Over the last two decades or so, the idea of queerness is one that has been utilized and considered by individuals and communities of marginalized sexualities and genders. The concept is one that has attempted to broaden and deconstruct traditional notions of gender and sexuality in order to include all of their incarnations as valid experiences and identities. Queerness endeavors to include all of those who feel they are a part of it yet, seemingly, not everyoneRead MoreRelationship Between Sex And Power955 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction Michel Foucault was a French philosopher, historian, social theorist, philologist and literary critic whose work had a tremendous impact on several disciplines. He was not a sociologist by training, but he worked diligently on sociological issues and otherwise had significant influence on the work of other sociologists. One of his most famous works is the The History of Sexuality, in which he examines the emergence of sexuality as a discursive object and separate sphere of lifeRead More Repression and Fear of Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, and Transgender Americans1610 Words   |  7 PagesSan Francisco boast attendance in the hundreds of thousands. The legislative act of prohibition has provided strength to the prohibited acts in the case of sexual behavior and identity. Michel Foucault best explains how homosexuality became an identity and a category. In The History of Sexuality, Foucault explores the validity of the repressive hypothesis which claims that sex has been repressed in Europe since the Renaissance. For three centuries, the bourgeoisie, characterized by modernRead MoreHistory of Sexuality3607 Words   |  15 Pagesconcepts of Michel Foucault From 1989 to 1999, the time period of the Clinton Administration, a homosexual force entered the American consciousness. Court cases and rhetoric of the 80s incited a discourse in which homosexuality was re-articulated, re-negotiated, and unmistakably re-repressed (Davis 3). Supreme Court judgment and actions taken by Congress with the Dont Ask, Dont Tell policy exemplify theories of sexuality and power expressed in the philosophies of Michel Foucault. FoucaultRead Moreâ€Å"the Sodomite Had Been a Temporary Aberration; the Homosexual Was Now Species.† Explain What Foucault Means by This Remark with Reference to the Nineteenth Century Process He Calls â€Å"the Medicalisation of the Sexually Peculiar†.2171 Words   |  9 Pages4. â€Å"The sodomite had been a temporary aberration; the homosexual was now species.† Explain what Foucault means by this remark with reference to the nineteenth century process he calls â€Å"the medicalisation of the sexually peculiar†. At the heart of the statement and references contained in the title are illustrations of how power is expressed through normative discourse in Western capitalist society. The process of how an act once termed ‘sodomy’ became transformed into the term ‘homosexual’Read MoreThe Prominence of Sex in International Government Relations1662 Words   |  7 Pagesbackdrop of a leader’s sexuality in the situate of public scandal in order shed light on the manner by which this progression from the private sexual fantasy to the public eye is one of control and manipulation in efforts to paint people and situations they inhabit until scandal breaks out and the public transforms from the controlled into the judge, jury, and social executioner of that which has departed from the normality, based solely on the department from the normality. Foucault says that sex â€Å"isRead MoreHomosexuality and University Press5666 Words   |  23 Pagesinvolved belong to the humanities and social sciences: language and literature, history, cultural and communication studies, sociology, anthropology and political sciences, philosophy. Sociology had a late start although some of the key figures in the field were sociologists (Mary McIntosh, Ken Plummer, Jeffrey Weeks), but their work was seen as primarily historical. Michel Foucault made a major imprint with the first volume of his Histoire de la sexualità © (1976). Other major sociologists contributedRead MoreSexuality in Literature Essay2653 Words   |  11 PagesSexuality has always an issue of conflict and debate. Who controls sexuality, and is male and female sexuality really distinguishable. People have always been having sex; for reproduction and for pleasure. Even though it is a women’s and a man’s rightful claim to this intercourse women tend to feel as if sexuality is against them. This would also be contingent on the type on society one lives in. In some societies the mere topic of sex is tabooed and the subject is not confronted with clarity, meanwhileRead MoreCritical Social Theory : Power, Critique And Praxis3794 Words   |  16 Pages______________________________________________________ In order to delineate the nature of power and domination in understanding contemporary society, this major essay will provide an advanced critical and comparative analysis of the social theory ideas of Karl Marx, Michel Foucault and Dorothy Smith. Resultant of such analysis, this essay will also postulate how conceptions of power and domination may be used to cultivate practices of emancipatory social change for the enhancement of individual freedoms by including theRead MoreFoucault Power8957 Words   |  36 PagesThe Subject and Power Author(s): Michel Foucault Source: Critical Inquiry, Vol. 8, No. 4 (Summer, 1982), pp. 777-795 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343197 . Accessed: 26/09/2011 07:49 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and

Roland Barthes Myths Free Essays

Today Barthes’s many monthly contributions that were collected in his Mythologies (1957) frequently interrogated specific cultural materials in order to expose how bourgeois society asserted its values through them. For example, the portrayal of wine in French society as a robust and healthy habit is a bourgeois ideal that is contradicted by certain realities (i. e. We will write a custom essay sample on Roland Barthes Myths or any similar topic only for you Order Now , that wine can be unhealthy and inebriating). He found semiotics, the study of signs, useful in these interrogations. Barthes explained that these bourgeois cultural myths were â€Å"second-order signs,† or â€Å"connotations. A picture of a full, dark bottle is a signifier that relates to a specific signified: a fermented, alcoholic beverage. However, the bourgeoisie relate it to a new signified: the idea of healthy, robust, relaxing experience. Motivations for such manipulations vary, from a desire to sell products to a simple desire to maintain the status quo. These insights brought Barthes in line with similar Marxist theory. Barthes’s popular book Mythologies is split into two; Mythologies and Myth Today, the first section consisting of a collection of essays on selected modern myths and the second further and general analysis of the concept.At this presentation, we will get into Myth Today from Roland Barthes view. Myth Today Since we cannot draw up the list of the dialectal forms of bourgeois myth, we can always sketch its rhetorical forms. These figures are transparent inasmuch as they do not affect the plasticity of the signifier; but they are already sufficiently conceptualized to adapt to an historical representation of the world. It is through their rhetoric that bourgeois myths outline the general prospect of this pseudo-physis which defines the dream of the contemporary bourgeois world.Here are its princible figures; 1- The Inoculation: One immunizes the contents of the collective imagination by means of a small inoculation of acknowledged evil; one thus protects it against the risk of a generalized subversion. This liberal treatment would not have been possible only a hundred years ago. Then, the bourgeois Good did not compromise with anything, it was quite stiff. It has become much more supple since: the bourgeoisie no longer hesitates to acknowledge some localized subversions: the avantgarde, the irrational in childhood, etc.It now lives a balanced economy: as in any sound joint-stock company, the smaller shares – in law but not in fact – compensate the big ones. 2- The Privation of History: Myth deprives the object of which it speaks of all history. In it, history evaporates. It is kind of ideal servant. It prepares all things, brings them, lays them out, the master arrives, it silently dissapears: all that is left for one to do is to enjoy this beatiful object without wondering where it comes from. Or even better: It can only come from eternity: since the beginning of time, it has been made for bourgeois man, the Spain of the Blue Guide has been made for the tourist and ‘‘primitives’’ have prepared their dances with a view to an exotic festivity. We can see all the disturbing things which this felicitous figure removes from sight: both determinism and freedom. Nothing is produced, nothing is chosen: all one has to do is to possess these new objects from which all soiling trace of origin or choise has been removed.This miraculous evaporation of history is another form of a concept common to most bourgeois myths. The irresponsibility of man. 3-Identification: The petit-bourgeois man is a man unable to imagine the Other. If he comes face to face with him, he blinds himself, ignores and denies him. In the petit-bourgeois universe, all the experinces of confrontation are reverberating, any otherness is reduces to sameness. The spectacle or the tribunal, which are both places where the Other threatens to appear in fullview, become mirrors. This is because the Other is the scandal which threatens his assence.There are, in any petit-bourgeouis, consciousness, small simulacra of the hooligan, the parricide, the homosexual etc. , which periodically the judiciary extracts from its brain, puts in the dock, admonihes and condemns. One never tries anybody but analogues who have gona estray. It is a question of direction, not of nature, for thats how man are. The other becomes a pure object, a spectacle, a clown. Relegated to the confines of humanity, he no longer threatens the security of the home. 4-Tautology: Tautology is this verbal device which consists in defining like by like (Drama is Drama).We can view it as one of those types of magical behavior dealth with by Sartre in his Outline of a Therory of the Emotions: one takes refuge in tautology as one does in fear, or anger, or sadness, when one is at a loss for an explanation: the accidental failure of language is magically identified with what one decides is a natural resistance of the object. In tautology there is double murder: one kills rationality because its resists one. Tautology testifies to a profound distrust of language, which is rejected because it has failed.Now any refusal of language is death. Tautology creates a death, a motionless world. 5-Neither Noirism: This mythological figure which consists in stating two opposites and balancing the one by the other so as to reject them both. Here also there is magical behavior: both parties are dismissed because, it is embarassing to choose between them. 6- Quantification of Quality: This is a figure which is latent in all the preceding ones. By reducing any quality to qantity, myth economizes intelligence: it understands reality more then cheaply.I have given several examples of this mechanism which bourgeois mythology does not hesitate to apply to aesthetic realities which it deems on the other hand to partake of an immaterial essence. 7-Statement of Fact: A rural statement of fact, such as ‘’the weather is fine’’ keeps a real link with the usefulness of fine weather. It is an implicitly technological statement; the word, here, in spite of it’s general, abstract form, paves the way for actions, it inserts itself into a fabricating order: the farmer does not speak about the weather, he ‘’acts it’’, he draws it into his labour.Popular proverbs foresee more than they assert, they remain the speech of a humanity which i making itself, not one which is. Bourgeois aphorisms, on the other hand, belong to metalanguage; they are a second order language which bears on objects already prepared. Their classical form is the maxim. The foundation of the bourgeois statement of fact is common sense, that is, truth when it stops on the arbitrary order of him who speaks it.Everyday and everywhere, man is stopped by myths, referred by them to this motionless prototype which lives in his place, stiflis him in the manner of a huge internal parasite and assigns to his activity the narrow limits within which he is allowed to suffer wit hout upsetting the world: bourgeois pseudo-physis is in the fullest sense a prohibition for man against inventing himsef. Myths are nothing but this ceaseles, untiring soliciation, this insidious and flexible demand that all men recognize themselves in the image, which was built of them one day as if for all time. How to cite Roland Barthes Myths, Papers